These examples match the product workflows and fixed sample reviews: Range Check, Scenario Review, Budget, Bid Review, Economics, Credit Opportunity Check, Closeout, and Library.
The first hard-cost assumption is starting to shape underwriting, a memo, or a budget conversation.
Early feasibility
Is this underwriting assumption defensible enough to keep moving?
Support signal, evidence gap, and next review action before the assumption becomes the working story.
The team is choosing between scope, timing, funding, margin, or return tradeoffs.
Pre-commitment scenario review
Which scenario should we carry into the working budget?
Scenario candidate, tradeoff basis, and caveats that stay attached to the number.
A raw low bid looks attractive, but exclusions, allowances, alternates, or trade pricing may not be comparable.
Budget carried before award
Which bid can we safely take to approval?
Clarification list, comparable bid basis, and a decision brief before award pressure builds.
A scope or location fact may create project value, but the support is not ready to reduce the carried budget.
Budget and scope review
Is there project value we are leaving out of the capital stack?
Opportunity range, missing proof, advisor-review caveat, and bid-scope follow-up.
A selected estimate, scenario, or working budget is about to become the basis for a meeting, approval, funding conversation, or bid comparison.
Carried budget basis with source notes, caveats, and the review path it came from.
Cost movement, timing, funding, revenue, or bid exposure is changing ROI, margin, debt, or approval pressure.
Economics impact note and readiness posture before the team treats the deal picture as settled.
A project is closing and the team needs to separate approved scope growth from baseline cost drift.
Reviewed actuals and reusable historical support for the next estimate or feasibility check.
Start from the assumption, estimate, budget, bid package, economics concern, or closeout record already in front of the team.